Capital budgeting
Incremental cash flows
Decide which cash flows belong in a project appraisal: sunk costs out, opportunity costs and side effects in.
Learning objectives
- Identify the incremental cash flows of a project decision
- Exclude sunk costs, allocated overheads and financing costs
- Include opportunity costs, cannibalisation and working capital
- Build a project's incremental cash flows and NPV in a worksheet
A project appraisal asks one question: how does the company's cash change if it goes ahead, compared with if it doesn't? NPV is only as good as the cash flows you feed it, and most appraisal errors are not discounting mistakes. They are the wrong items in the cash flow line: a cost already spent, an overhead that exists anyway, or a lost sale nobody counted.
The rule is simple to state: include a cash flow if, and only if, it changes because of the decision.
ΔCF = CF(company with the project) − CF(company without the project)
- Sunk cost
- already spent or committed whatever you decide — exclude
- Opportunity cost
- cash an asset you already own would earn in its best other use — include as a cost
- Side effects
- sales lost on existing products (cannibalisation) or gained elsewhere — include
- Allocated overhead
- existing costs re-spread across projects — exclude unless total overhead actually rises
- Financing costs
- interest and dividends — exclude; the discount rate already charges for capital
- Working capital
- cash tied up in stock and receivables — include when invested and when recovered
A method that works on any project. Write the assumption list down, then put each item through the same test: would this cash flow be different if we said no?
- Direct flows (new sales, new costs, new equipment): in.
- Effects on the rest of the business (lost or gained sales on existing products, an asset you already own that the project will occupy): in, valued at what the company actually gives up.
- Spent or committed money (studies, past development, contracts you can't exit): out.
- Accounting allocations (shared rent, head-office charges): out, unless the total actually rises.
- Financing (interest, loan repayments, dividends): out; the discount rate deals with them.
Two edge cases trip people up. Cannibalisation only counts if those sales would otherwise have stayed with the company: if a competitor is about to take them anyway, the loss happens with or without the project and is not incremental. And an opportunity cost is the asset's best realistic alternative use, not a hopeful one.
Check your understanding
A company spent SAR 400k last year on engineering studies for a new plant. The board now asks whether to build it. How should the SAR 400k enter the appraisal?
Calculate
A fitness club (fictional) is considering a juice corner. In SAR thousands a year: juice sales 150, juice costs 95, contribution lost at the club's existing snack counter 12, and the corner is currently rented to a physiotherapist for 18. A design consultant was paid 7 last month, and the manager's salary (unchanged) would be allocated 15. What is the juice corner's annual incremental cash flow?
Data
| Net incremental cash flow | |
|---|---|
| Year 0 | -1.4k |
| Year 1 | 435 |
| Year 2 | 435 |
| Year 3 | 435 |
| Year 4 | 655 |
The chart shows the cash flows you will build in the challenge for Sahel Foods, a fictional juice maker. Year 0 carries the equipment and the working capital; year 4 adds back the resale value and the working capital recovered. At 10% the project's NPV is 109.2. Load it with the sunk study, the allocated overhead and the loan interest, and the NPV becomes −280.5: a good project rejected for the wrong reasons.
Challenge: Sahel Foods' incremental cash flows
Sahel Foods (fictional) is deciding whether to add a juice line. Using only the relevant assumptions, fill in the cash flows for years 0–4 (outflows negative), the net incremental cash flow each year and the NPV in B19. Three of the items listed are not incremental: leave them out.
| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Assumptions (SAR thousands) | Value | ||||
| 2 | Equipment cost (year 0) | 1,300 | ||||
| 3 | Feasibility study (paid last year) | 60 | ||||
| 4 | Annual sales of the new line | 1,200 | ||||
| 5 | Annual operating costs of the new line | 640 | ||||
| 6 | Contribution lost on existing juices | 80 | ||||
| 7 | Warehouse rent forgone each year | 45 | ||||
| 8 | Head-office overhead allocated | 50 | ||||
| 9 | Interest on the equipment loan | 54 | ||||
| 10 | Working capital (year 0, recovered year 4) | 120 | ||||
| 11 | Equipment resale value (year 4) | 100 | ||||
| 12 | Discount rate | 10.0% | ||||
| 13 | No corporate tax in this lesson. Outflows are negative. | |||||
| 14 | Incremental cash flow | Year 0 | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 |
| 15 | Equipment and resale | |||||
| 16 | Working capital | |||||
| 17 | Operating cash flow | |||||
| 18 | Net incremental cash flow | |||||
| 19 | NPV at the discount rate |
You're learning as a guest — exercises are checked, but progress isn't saved. Create a free account to keep it.